|
More Related Programs »
|
Batch Reflow vs. In-line Reflow
We have been producing small batches of lead-free boards using a bench-top reflow oven that we want to replace.
We have narrowed down the options to either a drawer type batch oven, or a small conveyor type reflow oven. Both look like they will get the job done, and have very similar specs and features.
Assuming that all things are equal, which would be the better option, a conveyor type oven or a batch type?
R. W.
Expert's Panel Responses
I have 13 years of experience selling batch and inline ovens. Batch ovens have their place. Smaller simple PCB, but for even prototyping a good, small inline from a quality MFG like ESSEMTEC will give you the performance of ovens 2 times the size. For lead free the tunnel oven is easier to profile.
Question for you...
What type of power do you have? Single or three phase?
Do you see your volume growing or PCB increasing in complexity?
Steve Pollock
Vice President, Essemtec USA
Steven Pollock has worked in the industry for OEMs, and large CMs before moving to application Sales. Pollock has been working in SMT industry for nearly 20 years.
|
|
I think your answer somewhere between quality and throughput. Assuming the quality is the same then can you get the throughput.
If the answer is yes then what do you think your throughput will be in a years time, best to plan ahead.
Also how much time do you have to put people on loading and unloading?
Steven Adamson
Market Specialist, Nordson ASYMTEK
Market Specialist for Nordson ASYMTEK. Mr. Adamson worked for Kodak, Motorola and Plessey, ICL in the UK with 5 US and 2 UK patents. He was awarded a HNC in electrical engineering and was 2008 President of IMAPS. Mr. Adamson was a respected mentor in the electronics industry. He passed away October, 2011. Learn about the Steve Adamson Memorial Annual Scholarship Fund.
|
|
Having supported both types of ovens; my recommendation would be the conveyor oven.
The batch may be fine for your current capabilities, but as your volumes increase the conveyor oven will provide the additional thru-put you will need to meet those volumes.
In addition, it will provide the necessary experience that you will need when you grow into an even larger system.
Edward Zamborsky
Regional Sales Manager, OK International Inc.
Mr. Zamborsky serves as one of OK's technology advisers to the Product Development group. Ed has authored articles and papers on topics such as; Low Volume SMT Assembly, Solder Fume Extraction, SMT Rework, BGA Rework, Lead Free Hand Soldering, Lead Free Visual Inspection and Lead Free Array Rework.
|
|
Assuming that all things are equal, which would be the better option, a conveyor type oven or a batch type?
A couple of points to consider:
- Throughput
- Maximum temperature rating of the batch vs. reflow
- Heating Technology used
- How is the heat directed or disbursed in the chamber or chambers
Uniform heating across your board
- Controller being used and how used
Stable gradient of temperature
Batch: Chamber changes temperature - board static
Conveyor: Chambers temperature static(fixed) - board dynamic
- Run samples with a profiler and compare.
- http://www.apsgold.com/learning/reflow
John S. Wasyliw
VP of Engineering, APS Novastar LLC
John Wasyliw is VP of Engineering with over 20 years of experience in complex mechanical and motion design including control and software development. He is currently responsible for all product engineering, new product development and commercialization for APS Novastar LLC.
|
|
The real concerns here are the heating types, and work flows.
- What type of heating does it use IR, convection, or vapor phase?
- Are the ovens capable of heating your assemblies uniformly and within your solder pastes specifications?
- Is your manufacturing flow more conducive to a steady stream of products, or smaller batches.
- Does the batch workflow keep your assemblies within the specified work time?
- Is there room for production growth?
These are all questions that would need to be answered.
Mark Waterman
Engineer / Trainer, Electronic Controls Design, Inc. (ECD)
Mark Waterman is a trainer and field engineer with 17 years experience in service and applications specialties. Intimate knowledge of soldering processes and measurement systems. Six sigma and statistical process control generalist.
|
|
You select cleaning methods and solvent chemistry based on the flux chemistry used, right?
Likewise, you select soldering processes based on the physical characteristics and required quantities of the product (CCA). These requirements include the size of the assembly, the type of components, the quantities expected to be built during the depreciation period (you don't buy a new Cadillac to go for a single ride, do you?
Of course not, you take a cab or other means of transportation), the quality level required (a small batch or conveyor oven may work fine for small quantities of prototypes or pre-prod units, but for large production volumes a larger oven with better temperature controls is required).
There are many considerations when selecting the best reflow method or machine and whether to buy or contract out. For example, some parts can't be convection reflowed such as certain switches, connectors, etc.
Other components cannot be immersed in liquids or caustic chemicals (LEDs and LCDs for example) so vapor phase may not be an option. Some can't be soldered by anything except laser or perhaps a selective solder machine. So you need to understand what's best for your current product and near-future requirements and select accordingly.
Keep in mind that if you contract out, you lose some control over schedule flexibility and the ability to make in-process changes easily and cheaply.
Richard D. Stadem
Advanced Engineer/Scientist, General Dynamics
Richard D. Stadem is an advanced engineer/scientist for General Dynamics and is also a consulting engineer for other companies. He has 38 years of engineering experience having worked for Honeywell, ADC, Pemstar (now Benchmark), Analog Technologies, and General Dynamics.
|
|
|
|
Sponsors
»
|
Faster, Easier & Smarter Jetting
The Genius™ Jet Cartridge is the next generation in jet dispensing. The one-piece Jet Cartridge is easily removed & lowers cost-of-ownership by 20%. Learn More ...
Nordson ASYMTEK
|
Counterfeit components - MUST you know?
MUST 3 Solderability testing can help identify counterfeit components. Compares the force measurement signatures quickly and easily.
Gen3 Systems Limited
|
IPC Outlook Sponsorships Deliver Results!
Introduce your technology, new products or services in IPC Outlook's weekly e-newsletter and website to see how e-media advertising delivers results. Reach over 200,000 industry professionals with low cost e-media advertising. Learn more...
IPC Outlook
|
Bench-top Selective Soldering Under $40K
Includes PCB handler programmable in X, Y, & Z, stationary solder pot/pump w/ programmable flow control, & wave nozzle w/ nitrogen preheat. See video.
Manncorp
|
Most Energy Efficient Inspection Lighting
The Green-Lites™ series from O.C. White. The most energy efficient, highest output, longest lasting line of inspection lighting systems.
O.C. White Company
|
|
No comments have been submitted.