IPC OUTLOOK Logo
The Knowledge and Know-how Connection
IPC OUTLOOK Logo
May 21, 2012
The Virtual Office Gains Momentum
Technology Briefing
Cheap Printable Electronics
Technology Briefing
Simple Tools for Managing Manufacturing Data
Supply Chain
Rethinking the Hierarchy of Electronic Interconnections
Supply Chain
Screening for Counterfeit Electronic Parts
Supply Chain
The Dawn of Optical Computing
Technology Briefing
Environmental Compliance - A Moving Target
Supply Chain
Detection of Counterfeit Components
Supply Chain
Through-Hole Component Phase Out
Ask the Experts
Fighting Counterfeit Electronic Products
Supply Chain
More Related Programs  »



Leaded Parts Through a Lead-free Wave
Are there any concerns if we wave solder boards with just a ...
Chip Component Cracking During Pick/Place
We notice chip resistor cracking during placement. The cracks are in the ...
TSOP Component Soldering Problems
I supervise no-clean, lead-free SMT lines in an area with no control ...
What are the Pros and Cons of Cleaning No-Clean?
With today's newer chemistries, what are the pros and cons of cleaning ...
SMT Components Popping Off During Reflow
One particular SMT component is popping off during the reflow process leaving ...
Can Immersion Gold PCBs Oxidize?
I have immersion gold PCBs that have developed oxidation. Is there a ...
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
What is your opinion about using round versus square apertures for BGA ...
Rules for Reusing Electronic Components
If you remove a component from a circuit board, and the component ...
What Is the Best Way to Reduce Dross?
What is the best way to reduce dross? What are all the ...
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
What are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a ...
More Board Talk  »
Solder Defects and Continuous Improvement
Solder Defects and Continuous Improvement
We get a lot of questions about solder defects. Is that telling us something about what's going on in the industry?
Print  »

Phil
Welcome to Board Talk. This is Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow, the Assembly Brothers, Pick and Place, from ITM Consulting.

Jim
Phil I'm looking at the responses and questions from our readers. We get an awful lot of questions about solder defects. Is that telling us something about what's going on, generally, in the industry?

Phil
Yeah I think it really does. And I got to tell you: at least these guys are asking the questions. I got to grant them that. How about all the others that aren't asking? This is something that just pulls my rickshaw. The fact that there seems to be complacency out there, "I'm okay to live with mediocrity," the idea, "Oh, a certain level of defects, that's okay. Don't fix something that's not really broken."

Well it is broken, damn it. This whole thing flies in the face of what you and Dr. Ron and I are always talking about, LEAN and continuous improvement. This is the opposite; I don't get it. I mean people are actually maintaining inventory in preparation for building scrap. This is insane. How did we evolve to this? Where did this come from?

Jim
Well perhaps people don't like to admit their mistakes, so they hide the rework people off in the back corner. We see this all the time – we deal with this very frequently in our consulting activities. People don't measure the defects; they don't keep totals, they don't keep accurate numbers: "Oh, it's hard!"

I think one of the problems is they don't want to know; they don't want to deal with DPMO, defects per million opportunities, percent first pass yield. They're taking first yield after you do touchup. All these things contribute. I think it's just hiding a problem.

Phil
Yeah, I agree. I guess you could say these people were in denial or something here.

We have something we call the consultant's dilemma. To paraphrase our Car Talk Brothers, but basically we feel like we're mechanics. One of the things we have in common with them. This is what we typically see. People have a defect problem: "Maybe if I ignore it it'll go away," like putting duct tape over the Check Engine light or turning the radio up to hide a sound.

Then they go a little further: now it's starting to get a little bit more severe, kind of swerving from side to side, hitting the curb, things like that: "Well, let's try to fix it ourselves," oh, finally getting to do something. Sometimes they succeed; a lot of the times they don't, and it gets worse. And then maybe they'll call in the consultant.

But anyway, it's that first thing, that complacency, where they're living with a certain level of defects. How do we get this way? Is this an indictment of our society and our whole culture?

Jim
It's not unique to the United States.

Phil
And a lot of people settle for, "Well, you know," and they send this stuff overseas, cheap labor, and "Yeah, you got to expect a certain lack of quality." Why? Why are you settling for mediocrity?

All right, I'll calm down now.

Jim
But please continue to send in your comments and your suggestions and even if they are solder defects, but we'll try to get back to you. Thanks a lot.

And speaking of soldering. Don't solder like my brother.

Phil
And don't solder like my brother.

Jim
And keep the kids away from the flux pot.

Board Talk programs are presented by:

Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.

Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Comments  »
Use the form below to submit a comment.
I think there are several factors that may be at work here. There may be a cultural factor, which was eluded to in the piece. There may be a resource factor, not enough expertise to go around.

However, we shouldn't overlook the "continuous advance of component technology factor". As we become comfortable with 0402's, and micro-BGA's, here come 1005's, QFN's, and .075 pitch through hole arrays, etc, etc.

As component technology advances, a complete re-engineering of processes may be required to keep defects under control. So, at least from my perspective, the advance in component technology is the most critical factor promoting soldering defects today.


K.D., Zhone Technologies
I think it's companies who set themselves up to get mediocre results in manufacturing. They lean up their workforce so much that it's impossible for the engineering staff to manage it all.

I'm the Process Engineer for 5 SMT lines, which have 6 pick and place machines, 5 ovens, 5 printers. On top of that, I'm also the guy for our through hole dept which includes 4 selective soldering machines, component prep, wash, and hand soldering. I have an Engineer who is just now taking over the printing process and data collection for the SMT area, and an Engineering Tech who helps in both areas.

I have DFM projects constantly, ongoing process validation, new process investigation, RoHS, REACH, and a slew of other things like that that have my constant attention. Now, don't get me wrong, I know I have tremendous job security, but in reality, it's more work than 3 people can do so things slip.

We hit the major defects, not the spikes mind you, but the consistent, lower hanging fruit that does "weekly or daily" damage.

When I worked for HP (pre-Agilent), they had an Engineer and Tech for every SMT and Through Hole process. They might be an example of what having "Fat Engineering Resources" was, but defects were very low and continuous improvement was very obvious and focused on.

I think it boils down to the resources your company can commit, in other words: You get what you ultimately pay for.


T.H.
Submit A Comment  »
This comment is about the program:
Solder Defects and Continuous Improvement

The is a general comment.
Your Name
Company
E-mail
Country
Comments
Discussion of pricing, recommendations for specific products or advertisements are not appropriate. All comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address, we request your email address so we can notify you if your comments are posted.
Authentication
Please type the number displayed into the box. If you attempt to submit information and receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and insert the information again.
Today's Sponsor
Today's Sponsor
IPC Member Spotlight   »
Featured Sponsors   »
IPC OUTLOOK Logo IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S, Bannockburn, IL 60015
Phone: 978-478-5112 | Fax: 843-682-4255
Sandy Gentry, Editor | Kim Sterling, Publisher
About IPC Outlook  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Sponsorships

Views: 928