IPC OUTLOOK Logo
The Knowledge and Know-how Connection
IPC OUTLOOK Logo
May 21, 2012
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
Board Talk
RoHS Recast - Are You Ready?
Supply Chain
Elemental Compositions of More Than Two Dozen Cell Phones
Analysis Lab
RoHS Exemption Review Case Study
Supply Chain
Environmental Roadmap: A Look Forward
Supply Chain
Energy & Ecology: Turning Negative to Positive
Supply Chain
Recovering Solder from Dross
Ask the Experts
Pb-Free Electronics Risk Mitigation
Supply Chain
Soldering Lead-free with Tin-lead Solder
Ask the Experts
RoHS War Stories
Supply Chain
More Related Programs  »



Chip Component Cracking During Pick/Place
We notice chip resistor cracking during placement. The cracks are in the ...
TSOP Component Soldering Problems
I supervise no-clean, lead-free SMT lines in an area with no control ...
What are the Pros and Cons of Cleaning No-Clean?
With today's newer chemistries, what are the pros and cons of cleaning ...
SMT Components Popping Off During Reflow
One particular SMT component is popping off during the reflow process leaving ...
Can Immersion Gold PCBs Oxidize?
I have immersion gold PCBs that have developed oxidation. Is there a ...
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
What is your opinion about using round versus square apertures for BGA ...
Rules for Reusing Electronic Components
If you remove a component from a circuit board, and the component ...
What Is the Best Way to Reduce Dross?
What is the best way to reduce dross? What are all the ...
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
What are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a ...
When Should You Use Underfill?
We have a circuit board assembly with a wafer level chip scale ...
More Board Talk  »
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
What are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a board that does not have to be RoHS compliant?
Print  »

Phil
Welcome to Board Talk. This is Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall, the Assembly Brothers, pick and place - or place and pick. We're here to answer your questions on SMT and electronic assembly process procedures, methodologies and dilemmas. 

Today we've got a lead-free question. It says, what are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a board that does not have to be RoHS compliant? What are some of the common pitfalls that one should be aware of?

Jim
This question surprises me, but since it's basic I think it's important if people are still learning the basics of the lead-free environment. To this specific question, unless you are just starting out opening a manufacturing facility, if you've been building boards over the last few years, you have been doing this.

If you've been building boards with a tin-lead process, you have been using lead-free components. Most manufacturers have eliminated tin-lead finishes on their components years ago. Panasonic, for instance, eliminated all leaded finishes in 2004 to be an aggressively green company in anticipation two years ahead of RoHS requirements.

Phil
Right. And they didn't ask your permission to do it, either.

Jim
And so in general terms we call this backwards compatible, when you get a lead-free component, and you're doing a tin-lead process. Virtually all components have no problems. They typically have a pure tin finish on the component leads. It solders perfectly well with tin-lead solders at tin-lead temperatures.

The tin diffuses into the tin-lead and you get essentially a typical tin-lead joint. The Hi-Rel people have some concerns about residual pure tin exposed in the leads for whiskering, but that's only in the very exotic Hi-Rel products. The one issue that remains today that's still a problem is BGA components with lead-free i.e., SAC balls on them. And there isn't any real resolution about this, is there Phil?

Phil
No, there isn't. And this is one of the most common areas of concern Hi-Rel customers deal with.

Jim
It's a huge topic. And we spent a lot of time on it in our normal lectures.

Phil
In our "Lead-free for the Exemptee" workshop, it's a major topic. People are coming looking for a silver bullet, and there are no silver bullets. In our humble opinion. The answer is nobody really knows yet. There's a lot of studies being done.

There's a lot of conflicting data. Stay tuned because more and more work is being done because it's a situation we have to deal with. There's still a lot of you out there that are not only not having to be RoHS compliant, but are restricted from using lead-free materials. So we've talked about before.

Jim
So in general, for most components unless you have an ultra Hi-Rel issue, there's no problem with your lead-free components in your tin-lead assembly except for your BGAs with SAC balls.

Phil
Your best bet in the meantime, if you're working with BGAs with SAC balls, to be absolutely safe, is reflow them at lead-free temperatures.

Jim
If you want to be absolutely safe, you have to re-ball them too. But whatever you do, however you solder, with whatever alloy and whatever temperature.

Phil
Yeah, don't solder like my brother.

Jim
And don't solder like my brother.

Board Talk programs are presented by:

Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.

Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Comments  »
Use the form below to submit a comment.
The main concern is a Pb free BGA in reflow at a leaded temperature profile which may cause defects such as voids or cracks. Pretty much all other components can be mixed with lead solder paste and a leaded profile used.

Robert Morales, Eastman Kodak
Submit A Comment  »
This comment is about the program:
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free

The is a general comment.
Your Name
Company
E-mail
Country
Comments
Discussion of pricing, recommendations for specific products or advertisements are not appropriate. All comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address, we request your email address so we can notify you if your comments are posted.
Authentication
Please type the number displayed into the box. If you attempt to submit information and receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and insert the information again.
Today's Sponsor
Today's Sponsor
IPC Member Spotlight   »
Featured Sponsors   »
IPC OUTLOOK Logo IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S, Bannockburn, IL 60015
Phone: 978-478-5112 | Fax: 843-682-4255
Sandy Gentry, Editor | Kim Sterling, Publisher
About IPC Outlook  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Sponsorships

Views: 1811