IPC OUTLOOK Logo
The Knowledge and Know-how Connection
IPC OUTLOOK Logo
May 21, 2012
Chip Component Cracking During Pick/Place
Board Talk
Stencil Printing Process Tools for Miniaturization
Production Floor
Mixed Technology - Which First
Ask the Experts
Stencil Printing for CSP's and 01005 Chips
Production Floor
Minimizing Voiding in QFN Packages
Production Floor
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
Board Talk
Estimating Stencil Life
Production Floor
One Big Cause of Assembly Problems
Production Floor
Board Deflection During Pick & Place
Board Talk
Pick and Place Placement Rate
Ask the Experts
More Related Programs  »



Chip Component Cracking During Pick/Place
We notice chip resistor cracking during placement. The cracks are in the ...
TSOP Component Soldering Problems
I supervise no-clean, lead-free SMT lines in an area with no control ...
What are the Pros and Cons of Cleaning No-Clean?
With today's newer chemistries, what are the pros and cons of cleaning ...
SMT Components Popping Off During Reflow
One particular SMT component is popping off during the reflow process leaving ...
Can Immersion Gold PCBs Oxidize?
I have immersion gold PCBs that have developed oxidation. Is there a ...
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
What is your opinion about using round versus square apertures for BGA ...
Rules for Reusing Electronic Components
If you remove a component from a circuit board, and the component ...
What Is the Best Way to Reduce Dross?
What is the best way to reduce dross? What are all the ...
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
What are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a ...
When Should You Use Underfill?
We have a circuit board assembly with a wafer level chip scale ...
More Board Talk  »
Standards Governing Polarity Marks
Standards Governing Polarity Marks
Is there a standard that governs how polarity marks are used to denote orientation of components on circuit boards?
Print  »

led_polarity_160120.jpg
Phil
Welcome to Board Talk. This is Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall of ITM Consulting coming to you from ITM intergalactic headquarters here on Mount Rialto in New Hampshire. We’re here to talk about processes and components and materials and surface mount, and all kinds of other exciting things that our listeners send into us.

Jim
I want to thank you for sending in your many ideas and questions and comments. We especially like meeting you in person when we’re traveling. If we don’t get to yours, wait, we may, or, but we apologize. Thank you for listening anyway.

Today's question comes from SB. The question: is there some standard that governs the polarity marks which are used to denote the orientation of an SMT LED component, PCB silkscreen, and on assembly drawings? Examples, cathode or anode in the case of an LED, Pin 1 in an IC. Must the mark be visible from the top, etc.?

They sent us a very detailed explanation, and I’ll just summarize it for you. They’ve been building equipment for a while and had not had a problem, but they’re building a board that had two different color LEDs on it. There were no questions with the assembly with regards to LED orientation during visual and automated inspection, until ICT. In circuit test says one LED is backwards on every PCB.

I look at all the information and cannot understand why. Based on the data sheet from each LED, the polarity mark denotes the anode on one LED and the cathode on the other LED. Needless to say, I was confused.

Phil
All right, well, where to begin. Well SB, welcome to the wide and wonderful world of surface mount technology and electronic manufacturing in general, because whether we're talking about LEDs, QFPs, QFNs, even PLCCs, SOICs, there is no standard marking for denoting Pin 1 on active components, I mean ICs, and certainly on polarized components. There's a lack of synerization there.

As you have found out the hard way in paying tuition for that lesson. Yes, on some polarized capacitors, in diodes, you will see a band or a color dot denoting typically the anode diode.

Believe it or not, surface mount having been around for about 30 years now in this wonderful industries, there is no standard on demarcation of polarization. What can you do about it? Well, if you really feel so inclined, start a committee. Why JEDEC has never really thoroughly addressed this, or JEDEC IPC, whoever, it behooves me. But the problem is exactly what you discovered, the fact that these could be arranged in different ways on your feed mechanisms, whether it’s tape or matrix. And there’s really no practical way for the pick and place machine to pre-detect it.

Jim
Think about the capability of your pick and place machine with the cameras, the vision recognition, the lighting, and everything else it can do to look at physical attributes of a component. And we can't come up, and the industry can't come up with the standardization that will allow it to accurately and repeatably denote the proper orientation.

Phil
All it would take is something like standardizing a dot placed in the vicinity of Pin 1 for ICs, or a dot will denote the anode end or cathode end, but let’s standardize on it, and let's have some consistency, and therefore, repeatability. But alas, nobody’s gotten around to doing it. And that's probably one of the biggest mysteries, I think, I've encountered in this industry, Jim. Something as simple and basic as this has been so severely neglected.

Jim
Phil, you’ve been talking about it as long as I’ve known you, which is well over 20 years now, and one would think that something would have happened. It just doesn’t seem that illogical.

Phil
Yeah, well, this industry ponders on. There’s a lot of other illogical, it certainly gives us lots of other topics coming up. Yeah, ‘cause we don’t do committees real well. That’s why we work for ITM. But anyway, in the meantime, we hope that somebody will champion this cause, and I think this type of thing is a little bit more important than some of the other things we see championed out there, but I won’t get into those soapboxes just now.

Jim
So we’ve wasted more than enough of your time, or you’ve wasted it listening to us. We do thank you for your support.

Board Talk programs are presented by:

Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.

Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Comments  »
Use the form below to submit a comment.
You an review additional information at:
http://www.pcbmatrix.com/downloads/files/IPC-7351/Component%20Zero%20Orientations%20for%20CAD%20Libraries.pdf


R.R.
I'm currently chairman of the Automated Component Handling Committee of the ECA/EIA, and we publish the EIA-481 standard for carrier tape. This issue of non-standard or no-standard marking for polarity or Pin 1 location has caused nothing but headaches for us.

We've done our best to establish standard rules for component orientation in tape, but our efforts have been hampered by the inconsistent markings by manufacturers and legacy orientation practices dating to the beginnings of SMT. Would one of you, Jim or Phil, be willing to contribute your thoughts on this matter to our committee?


Scott Carter, Tek Pak, Inc., US
Submit A Comment  »
This comment is about the program:
Standards Governing Polarity Marks

The is a general comment.
Your Name
Company
E-mail
Country
Comments
Discussion of pricing, recommendations for specific products or advertisements are not appropriate. All comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address, we request your email address so we can notify you if your comments are posted.
Authentication
Please type the number displayed into the box. If you attempt to submit information and receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and insert the information again.
Today's Sponsor
Today's Sponsor
IPC Member Spotlight   »
Featured Sponsors   »
IPC OUTLOOK Logo IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S, Bannockburn, IL 60015
Phone: 978-478-5112 | Fax: 843-682-4255
Sandy Gentry, Editor | Kim Sterling, Publisher
About IPC Outlook  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Sponsorships

Views: 719