IPC OUTLOOK Logo
The Knowledge and Know-how Connection
IPC OUTLOOK Logo
May 21, 2012
Chip Component Cracking During Pick/Place
Board Talk
Stencil Printing Process Tools for Miniaturization
Production Floor
Mixed Technology - Which First
Ask the Experts
Stencil Printing for CSP's and 01005 Chips
Production Floor
Minimizing Voiding in QFN Packages
Production Floor
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
Board Talk
Estimating Stencil Life
Production Floor
One Big Cause of Assembly Problems
Production Floor
Board Deflection During Pick & Place
Board Talk
Pick and Place Placement Rate
Ask the Experts
More Related Programs  »



Chip Component Cracking During Pick/Place
We notice chip resistor cracking during placement. The cracks are in the ...
TSOP Component Soldering Problems
I supervise no-clean, lead-free SMT lines in an area with no control ...
What are the Pros and Cons of Cleaning No-Clean?
With today's newer chemistries, what are the pros and cons of cleaning ...
SMT Components Popping Off During Reflow
One particular SMT component is popping off during the reflow process leaving ...
Can Immersion Gold PCBs Oxidize?
I have immersion gold PCBs that have developed oxidation. Is there a ...
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
What is your opinion about using round versus square apertures for BGA ...
Rules for Reusing Electronic Components
If you remove a component from a circuit board, and the component ...
What Is the Best Way to Reduce Dross?
What is the best way to reduce dross? What are all the ...
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
What are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a ...
When Should You Use Underfill?
We have a circuit board assembly with a wafer level chip scale ...
More Board Talk  »
Accuracy of Pick & Place System Ratings
Accuracy of Pick & Place System Ratings
For estimating equipment capacity, why can't we use the Pick and Place manufacturer's rating for components per hour?
Print  »

Phil
Welcome to Board Talk. This is Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow from ITM Consulting, otherwise known as Pick and Place, the Assembly Brothers. And today, our topic is on Pick and Place.

Jim
The topic comes from Q.R. in Phoenix, Arizona. Q.R. asks, "We're setting-up an SMT line. In estimating the capacity for equipment selections, why can't we use the Pick and Place manufacturer's rating for components per hour? They design the machines, don’t they?"

Phil
Oh, yes, they do and they're trying to sell you machines. I think the real answer to your question is we don't live in an ideal world, and not always honest, either. But, let’s look at it from two major components.

First, the Pick and Place machine manufacturer, is trying to sell a machine. He's got to demonstrate the machine at some specific rate. Cycle rate is ridiculous, because that would be putting down the same component in the same place in the same location, and we all know that's totally meaningless. So, generally, what they do is they have some rate they designate, and it might qualify if you're doing passives or simple ICs.

Generally, when you go and look at the machine, you'll see a demo board, and the demo board is usually optimize for the machine under ideal conditions. There have been attempts to come up with demo-build boards, or standardized boards. The ICC worked on that but it's not widely used, because generally the manufacturers is going to look a little different than one that's doing a combination of components.

Let’s face it, from the manufacturer's perspective, before we get a lot of nasty-grams from them, there are no two applications that are the same. So where do you benchmark it? How do you benchmark it? The closest thing are these test boards, but again, it's tough to do. So, we have what we call de-rating factors. The biggest thing with the de-rating factor is the real world, your environment, and there’s a lot of things going on here.

Let's start with your factory. If we’re taking an eight hour shift, are you really working eight hours? Well, most likely you’re not. Your employees take lunch. Do you give them breaks? Maybe there are a few slave masters out there that don't in certain parts of the world. What about change-over time? That’s probably one of the biggest killers. In addition to change-over time, even if you’re running high volume of a single board, there’s transfer time, or from the printer to the pick-and-place machine.

Typical conveyor transfer time is about four to six seconds? So, this is all adding up. There's of course, what we call bumbling time, or Dr. Rhine called, "floundering time." We see that quite a bit, too.

Jim
We should start with a more generic thing of down time, and down time is when you're attempting to run the machine, you're all set-up, there's a board waiting to go, or there's a board in the machine, but something happens. Of course, we all know, what is the thing that happens most of the time? The feeders jam, the feeder runs out, the tape doesn't peel-back right. The machine stops, an operator comes over, ideally very quickly, fixes the problem, and pushes the reset button and away you go.

How often does that happen? Once an hour? Once every half hour? Once every 15 minutes? And you start subtracting this significant percentage of the available operating time, and that all takes away from capacity.

Phil
The sad fact of the matter is, if you were to look at overall efficiencies, typical machine through-put rates running 20 to 40 percent of what was originally specified?

Jim
The actual capacity rated over the time that the machine is theoretically available. If you can get above 25-percent, that's very good. I wanted to follow-up on your floundering time. It is when a machine goes down, an operator comes and doesn't know what to do. So, they walk around trying to find somebody who understands the problem, trying to call a maintenance person, trying to call the supervisor, and the bottom line is: capacity is lost.

When you average these out over a significant length of time, what you need to do to estimate your capacity for a new line, you find that you're actually only going to get 25 percent of the machine's capacity in the real world.

Phil
So, that's the difference between what you might read on paper and might get in the real world. And that's about it for today's installation of Board Talk. Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow of ITM Consulting saying, "Whatever you do, don’t solder like my brother."

Jim/Phil
Don't solder like my brother. And keep the kids from sticking their hands under the pick and place machine, for crying out loud.

Board Talk programs are presented by:

Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.

Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Comments  »
Use the form below to submit a comment.
The IPC has attempted to shed light on this topic by introducing the IPC-9850 standard a few years ago. What many people don't realize is that the 50+ page standard is more than just a method for leveling the playing field when it comes to placement rates.

The standard goes into defining the methods for determining other performance characteristics such as throughput (not to be confused with placement rate), reliability and accuracy. Most people know only of the placement rate portion of this standard as this is what most pick and place manufacturers publish in their specifications.

Most only know of the placement rate associated with the 0603 placement pattern as this generally yields the highest placement rates. While this pattern varies the spacing and placement orientation of the components in an "attempt" to level the playing field, it is still not going to provide a means for comparing placement machines when it comes to typical SMT assemblies.

There is only one way to know which machine will perform best on any given assembly and that is to have the pick and place manufacturer do a test with actual board in question and then guarantee the placement rate. That said, the fastest rated machine may not perform best overall because with today's lower volumes and more frequent changeovers, in many cases the tortoise beats the hare.


Greg Pompea
Submit A Comment  »
This comment is about the program:
Accuracy of Pick & Place System Ratings

The is a general comment.
Your Name
Company
E-mail
Country
Comments
Discussion of pricing, recommendations for specific products or advertisements are not appropriate. All comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address, we request your email address so we can notify you if your comments are posted.
Authentication
Please type the number displayed into the box. If you attempt to submit information and receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and insert the information again.
Today's Sponsor
Today's Sponsor
IPC Member Spotlight   »
Featured Sponsors   »
IPC OUTLOOK Logo IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S, Bannockburn, IL 60015
Phone: 978-478-5112 | Fax: 843-682-4255
Sandy Gentry, Editor | Kim Sterling, Publisher
About IPC Outlook  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Sponsorships

Views: 615