IPC OUTLOOK Logo
The Knowledge and Know-how Connection
IPC OUTLOOK Logo
May 17, 2012
Stencil Printing Process Tools for Miniaturization
Production Floor
Mixed Technology - Which First
Ask the Experts
Stencil Printing for CSP's and 01005 Chips
Production Floor
Minimizing Voiding in QFN Packages
Production Floor
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
Board Talk
Estimating Stencil Life
Production Floor
One Big Cause of Assembly Problems
Production Floor
Board Deflection During Pick & Place
Board Talk
Pick and Place Placement Rate
Ask the Experts
Stencil Printing of Small Apertures
Production Floor
More Related Programs  »



What are the Pros and Cons of Cleaning No-Clean?
With today's newer chemistries, what are the pros and cons of cleaning ...
TSOP Component Soldering Problems
I supervise no-clean, lead-free SMT lines in an area with no control ...
SMT Components Popping Off During Reflow
One particular SMT component is popping off during the reflow process leaving ...
Can Immersion Gold PCBs Oxidize?
I have immersion gold PCBs that have developed oxidation. Is there a ...
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
What is your opinion about using round versus square apertures for BGA ...
Rules for Reusing Electronic Components
If you remove a component from a circuit board, and the component ...
What Is the Best Way to Reduce Dross?
What is the best way to reduce dross? What are all the ...
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
What are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a ...
When Should You Use Underfill?
We have a circuit board assembly with a wafer level chip scale ...
Board Deflection During Pick & Place
We notice deflection in the 8x8 inch panel being populated. Will this ...
More Board Talk  »
New High-speed Modular Chip-shooter
New High-speed Modular Chip-shooter
The FX3 is a new high-speed modular chip-shooter delivering cutting edge technology combining speed, performance and high-uptime.
Juki Automation Systems

Accuracy of Pick & Place System Ratings
Accuracy of Pick & Place System Ratings
For estimating equipment capacity, why can't we use the Pick and Place manufacturer's rating for components per hour?
This program first published February 2010
Board Talk programs are presented by:

Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.

Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Comments  »
Use the form below to submit a comment.
The IPC has attempted to shed light on this topic by introducing the IPC-9850 standard a few years ago. What many people don't realize is that the 50+ page standard is more than just a method for leveling the playing field when it comes to placement rates.

The standard goes into defining the methods for determining other performance characteristics such as throughput (not to be confused with placement rate), reliability and accuracy. Most people know only of the placement rate portion of this standard as this is what most pick and place manufacturers publish in their specifications.

Most only know of the placement rate associated with the 0603 placement pattern as this generally yields the highest placement rates. While this pattern varies the spacing and placement orientation of the components in an "attempt" to level the playing field, it is still not going to provide a means for comparing placement machines when it comes to typical SMT assemblies.

There is only one way to know which machine will perform best on any given assembly and that is to have the pick and place manufacturer do a test with actual board in question and then guarantee the placement rate. That said, the fastest rated machine may not perform best overall because with today's lower volumes and more frequent changeovers, in many cases the tortoise beats the hare.


Greg Pompea
Submit A Comment  »
This comment is about the program:
Accuracy of Pick & Place System Ratings

The is a general comment.
Your Name
Company
E-mail
Country
Comments
Discussion of pricing, recommendations for specific products or advertisements are not appropriate. All comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address, we request your email address so we can notify you if your comments are posted.
Authentication
Please type the number displayed into the box. If you attempt to submit information and receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and insert the information again.
Today's Sponsor
Today's Sponsor
IPC Member Spotlight   »
Featured Sponsors   »
IPC OUTLOOK Logo IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S, Bannockburn, IL 60015
Phone: 978-478-5112 | Fax: 843-682-4255
Sandy Gentry, Editor | Kim Sterling, Publisher
About IPC Outlook  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Sponsorships

Views: 2331