IPC OUTLOOK Logo
The Knowledge and Know-how Connection
IPC OUTLOOK Logo
May 21, 2012
What is Causing Oxidation?
Ask the Experts
Can Immersion Gold PCBs Oxidize?
Board Talk
Tombstone Chip Caps Revisited
Production Floor
Causes of PCB Delamination
Analysis Lab
Impact of Dust on PCB Assembly Reliability
Analysis Lab
Issues with Circuit Boards Exposed to Rain
Ask the Experts
Effects of Tin and Copper on Tin Whisker Formation
Analysis Lab
Early Detection of PCB Pad Cratering Failures
Analysis Lab
Lead-Free Solder Contaminated with Lead
Ask the Experts
An Investigation of Whisker Growth on Tin Coated Wire and Braid
Analysis Lab
More Related Programs  »



Chip Component Cracking During Pick/Place
We notice chip resistor cracking during placement. The cracks are in the ...
TSOP Component Soldering Problems
I supervise no-clean, lead-free SMT lines in an area with no control ...
What are the Pros and Cons of Cleaning No-Clean?
With today's newer chemistries, what are the pros and cons of cleaning ...
SMT Components Popping Off During Reflow
One particular SMT component is popping off during the reflow process leaving ...
Can Immersion Gold PCBs Oxidize?
I have immersion gold PCBs that have developed oxidation. Is there a ...
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
What is your opinion about using round versus square apertures for BGA ...
Rules for Reusing Electronic Components
If you remove a component from a circuit board, and the component ...
What Is the Best Way to Reduce Dross?
What is the best way to reduce dross? What are all the ...
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
What are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a ...
When Should You Use Underfill?
We have a circuit board assembly with a wafer level chip scale ...
More Board Talk  »
Are Gloves Required for PCB Handling?
Are Gloves Required for PCB Handling?
How important are gloves when handling circuit boards prior to assembly soldering? Phll Zarrow and Jim Hall review the topic.
Print  »

Phil
Welcome to Board Talk. We are the Assembly Brothers, Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall of ITM Consulting, and we're here to answer your questions on SMT processes, equipment, materials, procedures, and anything else you have on your mind. What have we got today, Jim? We've got a question –

Jim
We've got a question about printed circuit board handling from Bob W. in San Diego, California.

"At present, our operators and technicians do not wear gloves when handling PCBA's. Now I heard that this is not a good practice and we will get in trouble. How do you guys weigh in on this issue?"

Phil
Weigh in on this issue? Where's my soapbox? Bring out the soapbox. Here we go. Weigh the issue? Oh, man. Okay, calm down. Okay, here we go.

When ITM audits we consider best practices, in other words something that should be employed world class, that anyone coming in contact with a board assembly prior to final soldering should be wearing gloves or finger cots, period, no exceptions.

Jim
That means even the quality assurance supervisor who comes over to look at a board, don't just pick it up off the rework table. Put on gloves or finger cots.

Phil
Exactly, and the reason for this is because your fingers have oil and dirt, what we commonly call contaminates, and these can be transferred to the board and the result will be poor wetting, weaker solder joints, voids, and a host of other fun things.

Jim
Remember they're contaminates, and fluxes in your wave soldering machines will not reliably remove contaminants. If you get contaminants on those soldering surfaces, you're asking for possible problems.

Phil
You would think this would be common sense, yet per our audits the manufacturers who are actually doing this are in the minority. Most manufacturers really can't seem to be bothered. I don't know if it's bother or what else do you think, cheapo?

Jim
Cheapo and they're not tracking their defects. The same thing we talk about all the time. That was no joke about a quality control manager coming over after the first side of double-sided reflow and picking up a board to inspect it to show us something with her fingers touching the bottom side of the board which was then going to be flipped over and stencil printed and reflowed.

Phil
We see this kind of nonsense in CEM's and OEM's, alike, but probably one of the most important pieces of industry lore comes from our good buddy, Terry Munson at Foresight.


In a previous life, when we got to know Terry way back in the days of yore, he had established himself as the contamination and cleanliness expert at a very large, metropolitan automotive electronics company. I'm assuming they're still in business this week. It's hard to tell. Foresight certainly is.

Terry conducted a very interesting test when he was at this company. What he did was he made various cleanliness and contamination tests on circuit boards built on a line and he conducted a run of tests on the boards produced on the morning shift.

Then, using the same line, same boards, same materials, same product, and same operators, he basically tested the same cleanliness examination test on boards built after lunch.

This is something that came to be called the Lunch Hour Effect because what Terry observed was that the levels of contamination on boards built after lunch went up by several magnitudes and again, for the obvious reasons. People don't always practice best hygiene. Probably this is the same reason you shouldn't eat peanuts in a bar, but in this case, it's something that gets transferred to your boards and the results have an effect.

As we have said, the number of people that are actually using gloves and finger cots are far and in between. This is a practice everybody should be doing and people feel, "Well, I'm getting adequate results." But again, the question is, are you getting zero defects? We believe that over time, as Jim mentioned, if you're actually tracking your defects and you employ this practice, you will see an improvement. I can guarantee it and, of course, Terry's data backs that up, too.

Now, of course, if you are wearing gloves and finger cots, wear them properly.

Jim
We've seen some seemingly unbelievable things, particularly in rework areas, where people wearing their gloves have cut out the fingers where their fingers touch the board in order to get better feel and control over handling the boards, defeating the exact purpose that they're wearing gloves for in the first place. This doesn't speak much to the training integrity of that kind of facility because people are wearing gloves but they obviously have no perception of why they're wearing them.

Phil
Which underscores another important facet that you should not only tell people what to do, you should tell them why they're doing it. Knowledge is wonderful and knowledge is power.

Board Talk programs are presented by:

Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.

Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Comments  »
Use the form below to submit a comment.
I have used many types of gloves within my job as a QA engineer/auditor as you typically wear whatever the site stocks. Well, I recently used gloves at a manufacturer that were wonderful. Cloth with rubber tips (I am sure more costly). Cloth...slippery, and sometimes transfer oils from the manufacturing site or body. Rubber...sweaty and can be too sticky and uncomfortable. Combined...marvelous, I wore them all day and was wishing I would have asked for a pair!! For what it's worth.

Les Beller, Echostar, USA
Actually, I prefer to handle the boards by the edges. I've used gloves for stenciling - they seem to work best for me, but that's more of a health/safety issue to keep the paste off my hands.

But when loading & unloading the pick&place and oven, I've found that cotton gloves snag on board edges and rubber cots or gloves don't give good traction. In other words, if I were using gloves/cots I would probably be dropping a lot of boards. Just my 2-cents from actually running the equipment for many hours/days at a time.

I guess I also question how proper handling by edges could cause solderability issues on pads??? Seems to me good practice is good practice. Just wearing gloves isn't an improvement if they get dirty and you don't realize it.


Patrick Muldoon, JPD Controls, Inc
When you recommend gloves, it reminds me of a study I did years ago where we noticed that eventually after a few hours use, human oils were saturating the cotton gloves and causing more defects than no gloves at all.

Cots, on the other hand don't allow oil to penetrate to the boards. So, if your going to recommend gloves, make sure they are not cotton, or change them frequently.


Gerry Cooper, Teledyne Printed Circuit Technology
Submit A Comment  »
This comment is about the program:
Are Gloves Required for PCB Handling?

The is a general comment.
Your Name
Company
E-mail
Country
Comments
Discussion of pricing, recommendations for specific products or advertisements are not appropriate. All comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address, we request your email address so we can notify you if your comments are posted.
Authentication
Please type the number displayed into the box. If you attempt to submit information and receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and insert the information again.
Today's Sponsor
Today's Sponsor
IPC Member Spotlight   »
Featured Sponsors   »
IPC OUTLOOK Logo IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S, Bannockburn, IL 60015
Phone: 978-478-5112 | Fax: 843-682-4255
Sandy Gentry, Editor | Kim Sterling, Publisher
About IPC Outlook  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Sponsorships

Views: 1348