IPC OUTLOOK Logo
The Knowledge and Know-how Connection
IPC OUTLOOK Logo
May 21, 2012
VOC Free Flux Study
Analysis Lab
Enhancing Reliability of PB-Free Solder Joints
Materials Tech
Second Generation Pb-Free Alloys
Materials Tech
Reusing Solder Paste Samples
Ask the Experts
Processing and Reliability of Low Silver Alloys
Materials Tech
Developing a New Lead-Free Alloy
Materials Tech
NASA DoD Environments Testing Results
Analysis Lab
Will High Humidity Affect Reflow Soldering
Board Talk
The Proliferation of Lead-free Alloys
Materials Tech
How To Control Flux When Hand Soldering?
Board Talk
More Related Programs  »



Chip Component Cracking During Pick/Place
We notice chip resistor cracking during placement. The cracks are in the ...
TSOP Component Soldering Problems
I supervise no-clean, lead-free SMT lines in an area with no control ...
What are the Pros and Cons of Cleaning No-Clean?
With today's newer chemistries, what are the pros and cons of cleaning ...
SMT Components Popping Off During Reflow
One particular SMT component is popping off during the reflow process leaving ...
Can Immersion Gold PCBs Oxidize?
I have immersion gold PCBs that have developed oxidation. Is there a ...
Round vs. Square Stencil Apertures
What is your opinion about using round versus square apertures for BGA ...
Rules for Reusing Electronic Components
If you remove a component from a circuit board, and the component ...
What Is the Best Way to Reduce Dross?
What is the best way to reduce dross? What are all the ...
Risk of Mixing Tin-lead and Lead-free
What are the risks of mixing tin-lead and lead-free components on a ...
When Should You Use Underfill?
We have a circuit board assembly with a wafer level chip scale ...
More Board Talk  »
Switching from Type 3 to Type 4 Solder Paste
Switching from Type 3 to Type 4 Solder Paste
What are the determining factors when switching from type 3 solder paste to type 4 solder paste?
Print  »

Phil
Welcome to Board Talk. We're the Assembly Brothers, Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall of ITM Consulting, and we're here to answer your questions on SMT process, equipment, materials, procedures, or anything else you have on your mind. We're here today with a question that was sent to us by Circuitnet and this is from Ray W. in Andover, Massachusetts.

Ray's wondering, "What are the determining factors in switching from a Type 3 solder paste to a Type 4 solder paste for the printing operation?" Well, Ray, that's a good one. There's some real drivers there and perhaps you're seeing finer pitch components and some of the smaller passives and therefore, some of your apertures are getting smaller.

Jim
That's exactly correct, Phil. The only reason to move to a Type 4 paste – and what that means is that it has a Type 4 powder. It's a solder powder within the paste has smaller particle size. Type 4 paste particles are smaller than Type 3. Another one of those wonderful inverse scales that we have to deal with, such as wire gauge and golf scores.

With smaller particles, it's simply easier physically for the paste to flow into the smaller apertures. And the rule of thumb that we typically use is called the five-ball rule.

The largest particle in a Type 3 paste is 1.7 mils. The five-ball rule says that the smallest aperture I should use with that paste is at least as big as five times the diameter of the largest particle, which means for a Type 3 paste, that would be an 8.5 mil aperture. Anything smaller than that, five-ball, the largest particles would not span across that aperture and that's an indicator of the ability of the paste to easily flow in and out of the aperture. Type 4 has a smaller particle size. Its largest particle is 1.5 mils, so it can go down to an aperture of 7.5 mils.

In practical sense for leaded components, this transition is usually seen between 20 mil pitch, .5 millimeter, and 16 mil pitch, .4 millimeter. In other words, most people feel no problem doing 20 mil pitch with a Type 3 paste but if you get down to 16 mil pitch, that's when you usually run into these limits of this 8.5 mil aperture.

Phil
And that isn't to say you can't use a Type 3 paste for going down to a 12 mil. We've done it but it gets pretty tricky. You start fooling around with not only your aperture reduction but also the shape of the apertures. So you get to the point, why make life difficult for yourself?

And, of course, we're also talking about what we call sub-miniature passives these days, 0201's, 01005's, very small apertures.

Jim
These are driving a lot more people to look at the application of a Type 4 paste. In fact, for 01005's, people are actually looking, at least on a lab theoretical experiment basis, at Type 5 powders to print these very small apertures for these small chip components.

Phil
We'll talk about some of the limitations in the future, but there are some limitations using Type 4, but you can use a Type 4 across the board, even with large apertures, but there's a few reasons why you wouldn't want to and the first one is it costs more. One thing that should be noted is that more and more people, because of the mitigating factors we mentioned earlier, are starting to use Type 4 and so the cost is going down as demand increases, but there's still a pretty good size differential.

And there are some other problems of using Type 4 because we're talking about more particles and therefore, more aggregate surface area. The solder paste companies, with increased demand, have been working on trying to reduce these effects.

Jim
Let's review. With smaller particles, you still have the same volume or weight of metal in your joint, but it's divided up into smaller particles which inherently have more surface area, therefore more potential oxide or more potential oxidation during the process. So concerns include increased solder balling, poor wetting, and perhaps a greater probability to have to use nitrogen or another inert atmosphere during your soldering to prevent oxidation.

Phil
Another addition to process cost.

Jim
Correct. The other thing is that in addition to smaller particles, a Type 4 has a narrower range of particles so they tend to pack together more tightly. This can give you increased viscosity, which has been seen to make printing more difficult. And because the particles are packed tighter together, it's possible to do more entrapment of the flux gasses, resulting in higher levels of voiding.

Again, these are all known factors that have been around and with the greater increased interest and use of Type 4 paste, the solder paste manufacturers have been working very hard to overcome and mitigate these concerns. So we would say to you what we say with any new material or new piece of equipment, check it out. Do a proper solder paste evaluation of your Type 4 powder in your process with your stencils to make sure that it gives you the right combination of improved printing versus solder defects.

Phil
 Remember, all solder paste manufacturers are not created equal and neither are their products.

This has been Board Talk, Phil and Jim, the Assembly Brothers, and remember, whatever you do –

Jim
Don't solder like my brother.

Phil
And don't solder like my brother and keep those kids from sniffing the solder paste jar.

Board Talk programs are presented by:

Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow, ITM Consulting
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.

Jim Hall
Jim Hall, ITM Consulting
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.
Comments  »
Use the form below to submit a comment.
We use Sn63/Pb37 (J-STD-006B) solder in our wave solder process. We are going through a re-evaluation of our process. Is there any significant difference between J-STD-006B and J-STD-006A?

John Jorif, Lockheed Martin, USA
Submit A Comment  »
This comment is about the program:
Switching from Type 3 to Type 4 Solder Paste

The is a general comment.
Your Name
Company
E-mail
Country
Comments
Discussion of pricing, recommendations for specific products or advertisements are not appropriate. All comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address, we request your email address so we can notify you if your comments are posted.
Authentication
Please type the number displayed into the box. If you attempt to submit information and receive an error, you may need to refresh the page and insert the information again.
Today's Sponsor
Today's Sponsor
IPC Member Spotlight   »
Featured Sponsors   »
IPC OUTLOOK Logo IPC — Association Connecting Electronics Industries
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S, Bannockburn, IL 60015
Phone: 978-478-5112 | Fax: 843-682-4255
Sandy Gentry, Editor | Kim Sterling, Publisher
About IPC Outlook  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Sponsorships

Views: 1018